An application of Mathematical Induction to Inequality |
Problem Prove that : |
Mathematical Induction The use of
Mathematical Induction to prove is difficult. So we would like
to change the proposition to: nn+1
> (n + 1)n , " n ³ 3 (2) However, the change does
not improve much! You may try before you carry on. |
Change of Proposition It is interesting that you can
change the proposition to : P(n) : v ³ n ³ 3, nvn > (v + 1)n. Induction on n. Proof: For P(3), 3v3 = v3 +v3 + v3
³ v3
+ 3v2 + 9v
(since v ³ 3) =
v3 + 3v2 + 3v + 6v >
v3 + 3v2 + 3v + 1 =
(v + 1)3. \
P(3) is true. Assume P(k) is true for
some k, where v ³ k ³ 3, that is, kvk >
(v + 1)k…… (*) For P(k + 1),
(k + 1)vk+1 =
(k + 1) v vk = (kv + v)
vk ³ (kv + k) vk = (v + 1) kvk >
( v + 1)(v + 1)k,
by (*) =
(v + 1)k+1. \ P(k + 1) is also true. By the Principle of
Mathematical Induction, P(n) is true "nÎN, where v ³ n ³ 3. Hey, my friend. The proof is complete by
putting v = n. Check this! |
Another viewpoint In the
discussion of the constant e in most textbook, the sequence is shown to be bounded and
monotonic increasing. If we assume that is proved, then this
problem can be solved easily. Applying this, Hence (2) is proved.
Result follows! |